"10 O'Clock Live" - Survey Results My Own Summary

I know you can read a summary on the link given in an earlier post, but I would like to highlight a few things.

First of all, when comparing the results to what I saw on Twitter, in reviews and on forums I think those social media and articles give a good idea of how people think. Pretty much the same results came out of the survey. The big difference is that the survey's summary is a bit less extreme in its judgement. But then again, the summary averages everything out.

Here are some numbers:
Average score for the show: 5.6 out of 10

Level of Funny per presenter:
David Mitchell: 3.75 stars out of 5
Charlie Brooker: 3.72 stars out of 5
Jimmy Carr: 3.1 Stars out of 5
Lauren Laverne: 2.27 stars out of 5

Importance of presenter to show:
David Mitchell with an average score of 7.5
Charlie Brooker with an average score of 6.9
Jimmy Carr with an average score of 6.0
Lauren Laverne with an average score of 4.7

The sketches don't score very well. Average score is 4.5.
The monologues score an average of 6.3. CB & DM score same average.
The interviews score an average of 5.6 with DM's interview with 1 person as a favourite.
The Round table discussion lead by LL scores low with an average of 4.6.
Just like in the 'funny' and 'importance' questions, DM scores highest and LL scores lowest.

A worrying (or when you are as sadistic as me, funny) result is that to the question: "would you stay watching 10 O'Clock Live without the clash with the likes of Question Time and Skins?" the most answers have been 'No'. It counted only 5 more than the answer 'Possibly'.